Verna Management Consulting LLC · Alpharetta, GA · Est. 2021

Portfolio Command Center

One board-level source of truth across the three lanes of the holdco — build (greenfield software), buy (SMB acquisitions), and M&A. Every figure below is read from the live build ledger and verified deployments — nothing modeled, nothing inflated.

8 live deployments6 active builds ~300+ build-hours2 acquisition tracks Revenue: $0 (pre-revenue)
Active build lanes
6
AutoVox · Enterns · Vlab · Airmo · Memoria · Nori&Oak
Live deployments
8
URLs returning 200/302
Revenue (all units)
$0
pre-revenue — distribution is the constraint
Acquisition tracks
2
Laundromat (active) · Gas-station (secondary)
Top priority horse
AutoVox
score 6.85 · "first paid pilot"
Build capacity
5+ AI stacks
Claude · Codex · Gemini · local · agent frameworks
The honest headline. Across two macOS users, 5+ AI coding tools, a VPS and fly.io, ~10 software initiatives plus 2 acquisition tracks: a great deal is built and deployed; almost nothing is sold. 8 live URLs and multiple agentic stacks against $0 revenue — the binding constraint is distribution/GTM, not build capacity. Strategy: capture everything once, then point the build farm at outreach and put one product in front of a paying human.

Portfolio phase matrix

P0 spec → P5 revenue · verified

Every in-scope initiative by lifecycle phase. done · active · shell/partial · · not started.

InitiativeLaneP0 SpecP1 SetupP2 BuildP3 TestP4 LiveP5 RevStage

Priority scoring

Turnaround·Status·World·Growth

Council-weighted score (.30/.25/.25/.20). Drives where scarce hours go.

Build vs. revenue

the gap

Deployments shipped vs. paying customers — the distribution deficit in one view.

The three lanes

drill in